![]() ![]() ![]() My thoughts are that if I create a new SuperDuper clone each time the os is updated, and keep CCC doing scheduled backups, and I need to restore everything, could I use the SuperDuper backup to restore the System and Data files that were current at the time of the last os update and use CCC to restore the current up to date Data files. Or have I got the whole thing completely wrong?Ĭlick to expand.No, it does not need to be downloaded. If the problem is corruption in the software, the entire system can be restored from the secure enclave that Apple has created in the system. There is a section of the storage fabric in which the entire system files, as updated by Apple, are stored. On a reinstallation of the system, those files are copied from that secure enclave to create a snapshot of a bootable system. The system does checksum type error checking and then compares the checksums against what Apple thinks they should be, and if all is good, the system is booted from the snapshot. (That's a simple version, what happens is actually pretty complex. If you want to know more, start here: Booting an M1 Mac from hardware to kexts: 1 Hardware and read all three parts of the boot sequence. Once booted, the restoration from TM or migration from a cloned backup puts your stuff back where you want it. #CARBON COPY CLONER 4.0 VS SUPERDUPER DOWNLOAD#ĭepending on which is the source, you may have other things to do to clean up the installation.īut there is no longer any need to download the source, it is there in the fabric. On clones and their value, Randy said it best:įollowing some research and testing I have come to the following conclusions. ![]() Both CCC and SD backups can be made bootable and do actually boot.Both CCC and SD can then update the Data on a regular basis but neither program will update the operating system contained within that backup.To update the operating system with both programs the backup disk is erased before the update takes place, so all previously backed up Data is lost.The only difference that I can find between the two programs is that CCC does not recommend bootable backups whereas SD appears to encourage it by its marketing.I am running a paid for version of CCC and, at the moment, a free version of SD and cannot see any benefit in buying a copy of SD, which effectively does the same.Both programs appear to suggest that is not necessary to actually create bootable backups as their use is limited. #CARBON COPY CLONER 4.0 VS SUPERDUPER FREE# The only decision left is whether or not to make CCC create bootable backups and lose all historic data when I update the operating system in them!!. #CARBON COPY CLONER 4.0 VS SUPERDUPER UPDATE# #CARBON COPY CLONER 4.0 VS SUPERDUPER FREE#īombich has basically thrown in the towel on bootable backups.#CARBON COPY CLONER 4.0 VS SUPERDUPER DOWNLOAD#.#CARBON COPY CLONER 4.0 VS SUPERDUPER SOFTWARE#.#CARBON COPY CLONER 4.0 VS SUPERDUPER UPDATE#. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |